Reply to Coverage of Gaza City Invasion

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "Coverage of Gaza City Invasion "

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Probably time for Ham*** to call an end to this.[/quote]

Oh shut your nazi mouth. This is what israel wants - complete anihilation and death. [/quote]

I mean, whoa.  I am just calling for the end of the conflict. Ham** started it with their brutal attack of October 7.[/quote]

What about the 85+ years of Zionist attacks and abuses BEFORE 10/7? Forgot about those decades of unending slaughter, did ya?[/quote]

What about the Arab onslaught on Israel the day the state was created in 1948?  Apparently, only Israeli defensive activity merits the label "genocide", rather than Palestinian determination to exterminate the country and everyone in it, demonstrated time and time again through Oct 7.  Happily, the Arab states proved incompetent militarily, and the Palestinians have shown themselves equally inept.  [/quote]

I started this thread to discuss and raise awareness of the lack of coverage of a major operation initiated by a close ally of the United States.  Regardless of where you stand in the defense vs genocide debate [b]I think everyone agrees that an action this large taken by a close ally should receive significant attention. [/b]

Good lord a military parade in china is receiving 1000x more coverage than an actual invasion [/quote]

No we don't agree.

Anyway you just want us to watch so we can finally, in your mind, come to our senses and hate Israel and rise up against it. [/quote]

DP
It’s funny how you put a finger at others for having an agenda while you inadvertently reveal your own.[/quote]

No...I didn't reveal an agenda of mine (I don't have one), I revealed yours...identifying propaganda doesn't mean I have propaganda of my own. In the liberal arts tradition, well-read critical thinkers do not have to and do not usually take a "side" in these sort of matters. We watch for patterns and rhetoric.[/quote]

First of all, you don’t see to understand how the DP identifier works.

Second of all, [b]your “you just want us to criticize Israel” line was the mask dropping on your supposed impartiality[/b].

You’re not objective. You DO have a dog in the fight. Pretending you don’t is far worse than just acknowledging it.[/quote]

No, it doesn't. The world isn't divided into Israel vs Palestine with every human taking a side. However, keen observers can recognize those who have taken sides and those who seek to sway others to take a side. You want us to watch, to take a side (your preferred side). If we just watch we will finally com to our sense and see how awful those people are, right? We just need to see! [/quote]

At times, there are absolutes in life. The fact that you don’t acknowledge that Israelis are awful people is proof that you have an agenda. Otherwise, are we to understand it that you think those who don’t condemn the Nazi atrocities of the last century don’t have an agenda, and are not awful human beings?

Holocaust denial is totally acceptable because those individuals “won’t be forced to take sides”?[/quote]

First, "not condemning" isn't "denial".

Second, if "Israelis are awful people" a whole nation with no individual variation, then what the Nazis did weren't atrocities, any more than what God did for Noah. What exactly are you trying to say?

[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics