Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Entertainment and Pop Culture
Reply to "Lively/Baldoni Lawsuit Part 2"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Why do you suppose they only gave it in excerpted form with no date. Clearly it doesn’t directly flow from the text on the left as you can see someone other than JV responded to his last statement.[/quote] And that's why I have acknowledged several times, and I think I brought it up first, that it needs to be dated and authenticated, and Wayfarer should turn it over in their discovery. It's just I predict it will be dated before the suit knowing how Freedman is.[/quote] My point is that’s no accidental. Moreover quite sure BL and SJ already have this text. We’ll see, WF still has a response to the motion to compel. They also can move to strike the JV declaration.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
