Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
College and University Discussion
Reply to "Interesting standardized testing data from Princeton's freshmen survey"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Can someone, without an agenda, explain why it seems that lower sat scores seem to have no association with dropout or retention rates at these schools? If these tests are such good predictors of success, why wouldn’t. Complete 100 point drop in score not change your outcomes.[/quote] US colleges spend a lot of time trying to find the best students (while rejecting mos) for a particular class and then exert a ton of effort to ensure they graduate. A top Canadian school like U Toronto essentially admits everyone who meets a certain threshold but then is quick to fail you out if you aren’t cutting it. They bake a failure rate into their numbers because they could never have say 100% of the starting EE majors actually continue all 4 years as they don’t plan for that when you get to more advanced classes. [/quote] This and there isn’t a linear relationship between test performance and school performance above a certain threshold. [/quote] That is the opposite of true. The relationship continues all the the way up to 1600. And your chances of admission continue to increase with SAT score all the way up to 1600. Wishful thinking has created a mythology around test scores that makes it easy for mid kids to think they have a shot at top schools. They don't.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics