Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Jobs and Careers
Reply to "Reasonable Accommodation Abuse?"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Just about EVERYONE can find a reason to work from home full time. And they will find it. Pre-COVID I was a fed manager and I can attest that WFH is not sustainable long-term if there are major duties that absolutely must be done in-house, particularly for security reasons. I had one employee who figured out a way to get a WFH based on RA 5 days a week. The reality is employee had purchased a country home 2 hours away from office and didn't want to commute anymore. Employee used a common health condition (I was told what it was) as the basis for RA and HR told us they must be accommodated. So be it. Once this happened there were 3 more employees who used the same tactics to get WFH 5 days per week. It amounted to more than 50% of the team who could not do a majority of their critical/secure duties because they were at home. Guess who wound up going to all the in-person required meetings, doing all the secure work, etc. Everyone else. There was no additional pay for these additional duties, however. We had documented evidence that the WFH employees were NOT working, they were outside doing construction work on their country home, running an Ebay resale business out of their home, and doing the admin work for their spouse's business. Went to HR and asked about getting job descriptions rewritten based on actual duties employees were performing and it would have reduced their grades substantially (Eg. GS-13s were ACTUALLY doing work at the GS-7 or 9 level.) So HR didn't want to go down that rat hole. Once we tried for several days to get ahold of the country bumpkin who refused to answer personal phone and wasn't responding to e-mails. Bumpkin was actually annoyed that we were reaching out and considered it an "interruption" to the work they were doing around their country home. Bottom line: HR didn't care and management didn't want to take it on because they feared accusations of discrimination. What wound up happening is that these employees "worked" from home FOR YEARS because of RA and the American people paid their salaries for virtually nothing. [/quote] Sounds like YOU committed timecard fraud every time you approved at least some of these folks' timecards. Better watch your back![/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics