Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Volleyball
Reply to "Metro vs Paramount (vs other top clubs)"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous] [u]TLDR[/u] Using these facts: 9 players leave the 13-1s, 2 to teams that finished higher in 14-1s, 7 go to teams that finished lower. 9 join from lower ranked teams. Of the 6 returning players, only 3 have starting spots on the new 14-1 team. 4 of the 9 new players come in and take starting spots. Overall performance goes up. What's more likely: That the 9 players, and especially the 4 starters that joined from lower ranked teams are suddenly developed into top players on a top team with just a few months of coaching. Or That most of those 9 players, and definitely the 4 starters, were already better than the players on the 13-2s team and at least as good (and some likely better) than returning 13-1s players in the same positions. Based on the data and all the one off examples raised so far, its much more likely that the second scenario is what is happening.[/quote] I have a different view of the data you presented. 9 players from Paramount 13-1 went to: 1 MDJRS #16 1 Metro Travel #46 1 Blue Ridge #140 2 VAJRS #530 1 Paramount 13-2 #596 1 VAE #2194 1 American 15-1 1 Overseas They were replaced by these 9 players from: 2 American #327 3 VAJRS #530 1 DYS #773 1 Metro SPW #2377 1 MOJO #2562 1 Unknown If you look at these rankings for a while, you’ll see that this team (#211) lost players to teams ranked higher than them, took players from teams ranked lower than them, and performed better the next year (#96). This is a great achievement. You’re saying they lost non-stars to teams ranked higher than them and took stars from teams ranked lower than them, which led to their improvement. Then I ask you: why did the higher-ranked teams take non-stars from this team instead of taking stars from the lower-ranked teams? Isn't what they did "doing more with less"?[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics