Reply to Sockless Grooms

Forum Index » Beauty and Fashion

Reply to "Sockless Grooms"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Sockless men in general isn't an issue. It's the whole look/vibe of these grooms in their tuxes wearing pants that are too short or too narrow, no socks with black velvet "tuxedo" slippers. Can someone explain what look they are going for? [/quote]

Vintage Euro. It’s very elegant. [/quote]

:lol:

No.

It's not
[/quote]

No really. Do an internet search. This is old money aristocracy/ Ivy League style.  If it looks freakish to you, you probably grew up poor or middle class.

It’s back because “quiet luxury” and “old money” style is trendy. [/quote]

Stop following TicTok for what is old money and quiet luxury, because you clearly haven't a clue.  Please don't come back with your BS about how you are old money or your BF is or whatever.  Sockless is for boat shoes and shorts on the deck of your sailboat.  Not a wedding.  Good God.[/quote]

Never heard of Stubbs and Wootton, huh? [/quote]

They're slippers from the early 90s.  Funny that you think that's "old money".   It's not even old.  Unless you're 12.  Back to TikTok for you.[/quote]

Yes.

And in the early 90s, they were slippers for wearing inside with your PJs.  Not outside at a wedding  :lol: [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics