Reply to Autopen Investigation of Biden

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "Autopen Investigation of Biden"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Turns out the dummy (Comer) heading the investigation into Biden’s use of the auto pen during his tenure, is himself using digital signatures and autopen in conjunction with the review.  Makes sense.[/quote]

Digital signatures are not the same as auto pen. Digital signatures are the most secure form of signatures. [/quote]

This is not a technological problem. Do not fall for that shiny object.

[u]Pardons are supposed to be granted by the President [/u]and he must know the details of who he is pardoning and what he is pardoning them for. [u]Pardons are not supposed to be granted by the president's staff.[/u]

That's what was going on. Unelected staff like Anita Dunn and Neera were writing and granting pardons via the autopen machine.  That's why everyone is taking the fifth.

It's not supposed to be an automated process or signature. It's granting a pardon by exception, not as a rule. [/quote]

So Trump knew the details of all the J6 cases? Doubtful. And why does Trump have a pardon czar if the “pardons are not supposed to be granted by the president's staff”?[/quote]

For the perpetually stupid, Trump is presented with a document with the person's name and the offenses they've been found guilty of.  ALL the offenses are listed on that document by agreement of the pardoner and pardonee, or else they can be prosecuted for offenses not listed on that document later on.

The president then physically signs that document as a pardon.  No pardons by Trump have been signed by autopen.  The documents in the federal register are not pardons.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics