Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Off-Topic
Reply to "Expectation of Privacy in 'Public'"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]You are recorded everywhere. How do you not know this? A conversation held in public is not private. Nothing is private anymore. [/quote] You are totally wrong. It’s illegal to record voices; it’s been part of Maryland law forever.[/quote] Are all of you mere children, who don’t remember Linda Tripp? Linda Tripp was indicted in Maryland for illegally recording a voice telephone conversation with Monica Lewinsky without Lewinsky’s consent. Tripp secretly taped conversations with Lewinsky after Lewinsky revealed a sexual relationship with President Bill Clinton. Tripp's actions were illegal because they violated Maryland's wiretapping laws. OP: your Rivian-owning friend is going to prison over what he did ! [/quote] Another ignoramus who didn't go to law school but thinks he knows how to interpret legal rulings. You do realize that neither Rivian not 100 other companies (Ring, for example) would not be able to exist if what you're saying were true. Recording someone in public is completely legal. Recording someone over the phone, or at home not so much. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics