Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "Interfere with immigration arrests = obstruction charges"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]DP -why do they need to be under cover? The norm used to be that you were in plainclothes for a good reason.[/quote] According to Google “Undercover police work, as a structured and organized effort, emerged in the early 19th century with Eugène François Vidocq's work in France. While prior to this, there were instances of plainclothes officers, Vidocq is credited with establishing the first organized plainclothes unit, the Brigade de la Sûreté (Security Brigade), in 1811. This unit later evolved into a more formal security police unit under the Prefecture of Police” [quote=Anonymous]And you keep saying they identified themselves to the bailiff at the courthouse - so what? [/quote] Bailiffs are in charge of security in the court house. The agents made them aware of their presence.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
