Reply to NC Republicans are on the verge of canceling 65000 votes

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "NC Republicans are on the verge of canceling 65000 votes"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Is the 700 vote difference before these 60000 votes are counted, or after?[/quote]

What I don't understand is how you would know for whom these 60,000 people voted. Many of the voters being challenged voted in person after showing their IDs. They could have voted for either candidate. Or is Griffin angling for a new election to be held?[/quote]

This is what I was asking.  Are these 65000 votes already included in the total, or were they set aside on Election Day?[/quote]

This is bizarre! If a ballot is counted, there should be no way to know whose ballot it is.

So how could individual already-counted ballots be selectively cured??

This only makes sense if Democrat Riggs was losing and needed and needed uncounted ballots to win.

If Riggs is winning, the only way she could lose is if more Republican votes are counted, can only happen uncounted ballots are later counted.

That means that none of the 65K chalenged  ballots are counted yet, and Griffin is hoping they lean R after some are discarded. But if that's the case, then a 734 margin would not be a "win"  for anybody, and we'd all be waiting for the provisional ballot counts [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics