Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "Another legal resident threatened with deportation over protected speech "
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]OP, is your point that she has been here since age 7 so she is above the law? An ABC report states she was arrested for a sit in (trespassing) at Barnard on March 5, 2024. She isn’t being sought for her speech but for her action. If you believe that trespassing is not a crime, then I’ve got news for you. I hate that people simply accept media framing (whether Fox News or NYT) and do not think critically. If you think facing repercussions for trespassing harms free speech, well just wait until you hear about the January 6 rioters. It sucks, but don’t do the crime if you aren’t willing to face the consequences. [/quote] You know that those pedo trailer were pardoned, right? And trespassing doesn’t call for deportation? This is state sanctioned terrorism meant to suppress free speech.[/quote] You know your side wanted absolutely no mercy for the Jan 6 rioters, right? Kind of sucks now that the other side holds prosecutorial discretion, doesn’t it? You guys set the rules of engagement. Your side had the chance to show leniency when you were in control. Little late to make the case for it now. [/quote] Oh yeah because peacefully protesting a foreign war is totally the same thing as violently rioting at the Capitol, assaulting police officers, breaking and eterting, and trying to over turn an election process. Totally the same thing. What she did was peaceful and protected speech. What the J6s did was violent and akin to treason. [/quote] LOL. A little over half the J6 defendant were charged with trespassing or interfering with official acts. And you wanted no mercy for them. Columbia gets about $1 billion a day from the federal government. Assuming 50 working weeks per year and 5 working days per week that comes out to $4 million per day. She and her fellow trespassers intentionally sought to disrupt the education process through trespassing in prefer to achieve their political goals at great cost to the university, its students and the taxpayers. Not for nothing, the arrests at . If you don’t want to face consequences, don’t commit crimes (whether you are a J6 rioter or Columbia undergrad). Sorry, you guys set the rules of engagement when you held the power. [/quote] You're equating breaking into the Capitol--the seat of the US government--with a sit-in on a college campus? [/quote] I’m comparing trespassing to trespassing and the legal consequences for that crime. [/quote] J6= treason Sit in = trespassing It is stupid Fox News & MAGA logic to say they are the same. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics