Reply to Redshirting consequences at Lafayette

Forum Index » DC Public and Public Charter Schools

Reply to "Redshirting consequences at Lafayette"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]DC Regulations for these families is clear:
“Pre-k age” means children 3 or 4 years of age, and children who become 5 years of age after September 30th of the upcoming school year.
Per DC regulations their children are not Pre-K Age AND those parents should be charged with breaking the law and not enrolling their child in school (compulsory attendance. DC Code § 38-202(a))

[/quote]

This is so dumb. Their kids were in private prek somewhere they didn’t break the law. The amount of vitriol on this thread is sad regardless of what you think about the issue or these people.[/quote]
But they are not PreK.  They were 5 before 9/30 and therefore should be in K - which is what this is all about.
Jen & Jen & Avra thought their snowflakes were super special.
And now they are wasting the time of the ANC representative because the Principal at the school didn't let them make their own rules?

[/quote]

There are tons of kids who turned 5 before entering prek at independent schools. Should we arrest those parents too or is it those ones who can’t afford private school? Talk about inequality.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics