Reply to RD admission trends (gender)

Forum Index » College and University Discussion

Reply to "RD admission trends (gender)"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]How can this be?   
The executive order was clear 
"Section 1.  Purpose.  Longstanding Federal civil-rights laws protect individual Americans from discrimination based on race, color, religion,[b] sex,[/b] or national origin.  These civil-rights protections serve as a bedrock supporting equality of opportunity for all Americans.  As President, I have a solemn duty to ensure that these laws are enforced for the benefit of all Americans."

Trump stated that they can not be discrimination based on sex.
"The Federal Government is charged with enforcing our civil-rights laws.  The purpose of this order is to ensure that it does so by ending illegal preferences and discrimination."

If Trump is not there to protect these applicants who are more [b]deserving based on merit -[/b] who will?

Please raise this up as these schools are practicing DEI and clearly making choices that benefit men.[/quote]

I agree the process favors boys but I think it is because colleges have a genuine commercial viability need to keep sex ratios from getting too out of whack. They don’t do it to help boys. They do it to help keep themselves as appealing as possible to students applying.

I say this as the mom of a girl too. But - I posted earlier - I don’t want her going to a massively female heavy school. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics