Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Montgomery County Public Schools (MCPS)
Reply to "another SAFETY meeting"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I’m not a fan of metal detectors at all. I think they will be expensive and make kids late to class. I also think savvy kids who are determined to do harm can find ways around them. I thought ghost guns evade detection. This is not to say I think they’re useless. They might turn things up here and there. I just don’t think they are the big solution. I’m not sure what the answer is but we need a multi-pronged approach. We do need to do something. I know in some districts clear backpacks are required. Maybe that could be one facet. More SROs could be another. [/quote] I would much rather have SROs and more security guards instead of metal detectors. The SROs were very successful in pushing crime out of schools. If you were gojng to have a fight, you’d plan it for someplace off campus instead of the bathroom at school. Same for drug use and drug dealing. It would be great if we could get it so kids didn’t fight, do drigs or deal….but at a minimum there’s a benefit in pushing it out of the schools so that kids who aren’t into that scene can study and use the bathroom in relative peace, and the teachers don’t have to deal with it. [/quote] I would rather have all three - detectors, SRO's and security guards.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics