Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "Women in combat"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous]There seems to be a lot of confusion in this thread about what “women in combat” means. In efforts to clear it up for a more accurate discussion here is what it means: It means women in combat arms roles. Those roles are such that their primary mission is to engaging in combat with armed enemy forces. These roles are primarily infantry, artillery, armor, special forces, and specific aviation areas. It does NOT mean women in the military can’t be deployed to a war zone. It does not mean women can’t be promoted unless they work in combat areas. Women in the military have been deploying to war zones for decades. Women in non combat arms roles can and do see and sometimes engage in combat when deployed in various other support roles. But the argument is whether or not women should be allowed in roles where the specific primary mission is combat/engaging an armed enemy. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
