Reply to Will Wake ever be in the #30s again?

Forum Index » College and University Discussion

Reply to "Will Wake ever be in the #30s again?"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]The switch in methodology really benefits large schools that are accessible to unhooked high-stats kids and affordable to donut-hole families. Like most smallish test-optional schools the actual number of high-scoring students at Wake is pretty small, similar to schools like Syracuse, Iowa, or KU. What Wake offers that those bigger schools don’t is the ability to exclude more students, and the sense of superiority that a low admissions rate seems to engender. Some people care about that. Others prefer a less expensive, less exclusive school with a much larger cohort of high-scoring students. [/quote]

What drugs are you on?

48 percent of kids at Wake submit test scores with a median SAT of 1450.  My Wake student had a 1500 and a 3.8 at a private with grade deflation and top rigor.

32 percent of kids at Syracuse submit with a median of 1340
79 percent submit at Iowa with a median of 1240
79 percent submitted at KU with a median of 1160

Not one of these four schools is in the same tier as the others.  You just spew complete nonsense.[/quote]

Each of those schools is a different size. Wake is the smallest. Each school has about the same [i]number[/i] of high-scoring students. Of course that means the [i]percentage[/i] is higher at Wake. And percentage is very important to some people, obviously including you. Which is fine. It allows for the big fish/small pond effect, which certainly benefits some kids. But for some other kids, a small pond can feel, well, small. People seeking a school with a large [i]number[/i] of high-scoring students would be better off at a school like UVA or UMD or Wisconsin. [/quote]

Please share where you went to college so I can make sure  my child does not attend.  This reasoning is embarrassing AF.[/quote]

So the best schools are the largest schools because they have the largest numbers of high scorers? 🤯🤯🤯[/quote]

Only if what you are seeking is a large community of high-scoring students. [/quote]

Please please please go look up the definition of median.  The  lower the median, the more low scoring students  attending the school.  This isn’t rocket science.[/quote]

When did I say otherwise? But a large school can have 1,000 low-scoring students and 1,000 high-scoring students, while a smaller school might have 20 low-scoring students and 200 high-scoring students. The smaller school will have a higher median score, but it will also have a smaller group of high-scoring students. [/quote]

Median is not the same as average, so no.[/quote]

Are you seriously trying to argue that a school with 220 total students has a larger group of high-scoring students than a school with 1,000 high-scoring students? [/quote]
NP, if you were to take the median, the small school would have a higher average score. The big school would just be the average between the highest low score and the lowest high score. The small school will be somewhere around two middle high scores.[/quote]

?????[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics