Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
College and University Discussion
Reply to "What happened to W&M, Brandeis, Tulane, Pepperdine and others..from historically T50 to outside looking in?"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Everyone needs to stop blaming USNews for the rankings slide. It stands to reason that if it was only a USNews problem, that these schools would rank highly in Forbes or WSJ or other rankings. However, at least with Wake and Tulane, the USNews Rankings are the highest rankings...BY FAR. Actually, Forbes ranks W&M 55 and USNews ranks it #54 (WSJ is at 178). Seems about right. Pepperdine is #83 USNews and #125 Forbes and #145 WSJ. Brandeis is #63 USNews, #105 Forbes and #335 WSJ Wake is #46 USNews, #469 Forbes and #137 WSJ Tulane is #63 USNews, #147 Forbes and #451 WSJ [/quote] US News changed their methodology with the express purpose of becoming more like Forbes and WSJ. Wake, W&M, Tulane, Brandeis were all t40-30+ for many, many years. Only after the movement to value DEI did these schools start to be ranked among schools that had always ranked much lower. It is because of methodology changes and methodology changes alone that the (made up) rankings of these schools have changed. [/quote] Produce any reputable 3rd party ranking then...if you think all rankings suck, then stop taking issue with USNews' new methodology.[/quote] None of them are because they've all switched to social mobility. Nobody wants to be the one that says that isn't important.[/quote] Considering at least Tulane and Wake are chasing the new USNews rankings...something tells me if they move back to where they were prior, folks like you will start touting them again.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics