Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Jobs and Careers
Reply to "One of DOGE's "cost saving" suggestions"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote]Yup - lots of waste and sleepers in gvt but also lots of hardworking people putting in the work and extra hours. It would be lovely to think the cuts would be the waste and not the grinders, but I’m little hope of that[/quote] I'm all for cutting waste, but that's not what I was referring to. There are functions that I think are definitely beneficial and not wasteful (e.g., investigating contractor claims of whistleblower reprisal, having veterans' claims go to the Court of Appeals for Veterans' Claims before going to Federal court, Federal compensation funds for victims, agricultural research, space exploration), but if DOGE and the current administration are bent on significantly reducing the workforce, we may not be able to have those types functions/services any more. It takes people to administer functions and programs. If you want less Government, the Government is going to do less.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
