Reply to Would you buy a house with a solar lease?

Forum Index » Real Estate

Reply to "Would you buy a house with a solar lease?"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]This doesn't sound that bad. We were looking at a house that had a solar contract with Vivint that required the homeowner to buy electricity from the company. The rate was not awesome and it was a multi-decade committment. Replacing the roof seemed like a huge hassle with lots of complaints on BBB about how the company was not responsive when it came to taking the panels off.

However, I'm generally not [b]impressed[/b] with homeowners that enter into a contract or lease for such a long period and then leave after a few years and dump that contract onto the next owner.[/quote]

Such a strange word to use.  It's neither impressive nor unimpressive.  Many people don't like the hassle of making the decision to start, and the installation process.

It's like saying, I am "unimpressed" by someone that puts in a pool and then sells the house and "dumps" that pool onto the next buyer after several years.

Yes, you can just decide to buy another house.[/quote]

Always weird to have a sort of moral judgment on things like this!

But yes the Vivint example is why many posters are talking about being careful who you do one of these contracts with.  And entering into a Power Purchase Agreement is pretty onerous- frankly the homeowner there probably didn't understand that they should have gotten the electricity for free, or had less leverage in the negotiation.  Again, no reason to make some sort of moral judgment.  [/quote]

Whenever you buy a home, you take a big risk. The character of the owner matters. Did they paint over water damage? Are they selling because they became aware of a huge expense that's coming that they don't disclose? Usually, there's no way to know these things ahead of time. Signing a 20-30 year solar lease and then selling the house 5 years later is weird. Legal, yes. But also sketchy and irresponsible.[/quote]

Again…such a bizarre take.  It’s neither weird nor sketchy nor irresponsible.  Is somebody that puts in a pool and then sells one year later selling because the pool is leaking and destroying the foundation…or they got a new job in another city or any of the myriad reasons someone moved.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics