Reply to Is an ACT Superscore less impactful than a single test composite score?

Forum Index » College and University Discussion

Reply to "Is an ACT Superscore less impactful than a single test composite score?"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]There is no advantage for a one sitting 35 vs a 3 test 35.  Just none.  Once you are in the right range for that school they no longer look at test results.  No school goes back and says well this person had a 36 and the other had a 35 so we will take the kid with the 36.  The 35 and the 36  qualified them and the decision is on other things.  No one looks at that 36 again.[/quote]

That is straight-up bullshit. Continue to live in your fantasyland where nobody cares how much test scores are frankensteined to get to the finish line, but no self-respecting AO from a Top 50 school is indifferent to the 36 vs. 35 comparison. They’re just not.

It matters. One-and-done 36 is better than one-and-done 35, and both are better than a super scored 36.[/quote]

You are wrong.

Admissions officers don't care how an applicant gets to 34 or 1500. Get there, and then they can consider the rest of the app. They really don't give a damn if you get a 33 or 1450 on the first pass. Hit 34 or 1500 ultimately. It doesn't matter if it takes a couple of attempts.[/quote]

- said nobody, ever, whose own score or whose kid’s score was a 1600 or 36 in one attempt[/quote]

DP. My kid got a 36 in one attempt, and PP is right. The score is just a threshold the kid has to cross for further consideration. [/quote]

Untrue, and the evidence of that is right there in the CDS. Schools want the reported 25th to 75th percentile range to be as high as possible, and the pathway to achieving that goal is to accumulate the highest scores possible. Suggesting they are indifferent when choosing between two applicants who are identical but for the fact that one has a 36 and the other has a 34 or 35 is obviously incompatible with what we know of their agenda to boost their 75th percentile.

If all of you[b] “34 is just as good as 36, the schools don’t even check once you meet the 34 standard”[/b] experts were right, why would the standardized testing portion of the CDS simply state that the  “minimum threshold” is X?

As far as one-and-done, the poise to nail a 36 in one setting, given the pace of the ACT, absolutely has significant meaning over another a student taking four or five administrations to cobble together a 34 or 35. Cannot even believe this needs to be re-stated …[/quote]

Any score 34 and above is [b]99th percentile [/b]

Good enough for serious consideration, don't you think?[/quote]

I'd rather take the 36, thank you.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics