Reply to New rules: buying without an agent

Forum Index » Real Estate

Reply to "New rules: buying without an agent"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Regarding safety:

"Also, there are safety issues in play, and I think agents need to be careful about meeting people they have never met"

Disclose to sellers prior to your agreement they'll need to provide a security guard for you to show the listing to unrepresented qualified buyers. The seller can sign with you, and pay for security. That is their choice. Or sellers can sign with another listing agent who does not require this.

[/quote]

This is hysterical.

A buyers agent previously would show a house to a buyer without anyone else there.

This is no different.

If now you’re unwilling to show a house without a security guard or other agent attending then you should have had this same 
stance 5 years ago.

You’re grasping as straws here as to why someone needs to pay 2% to let them into a house.  [/quote]

PP I'm illustrating how ridiculous this agent is.  
 [/quote]

I don't care what you pay your buyer's agent.  I am just telling you (and my clients going forward) that I am not opening a door for you without an agent.  You can wait for the open house or you can pay an agent to open the door.  My time and safety are as valuable as yours. [/quote]

It's not unsafe to interview a potential qualified buyer in a controlled, public setting. You are being silly. 
[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics