Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Entertainment and Pop Culture
Reply to "Why was Michael Jackson not completely cancelled?"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Do people watch Woody Allen and Roman Polanski films? They do.[/quote] I find the Woody Allen thing conflicting. Most of the negativity around him comes from Mia. Mia had plenty of her own problems. Several of her adopted kids are dead, several have accused her of abuse, and not all the kids support Dylan and her accusations against Allen. What is the truth? Nobody knows.[/quote] Doesn’t change Woody Allen’s grooming behavior. (Come on! He made it official with Soon Yi the minute she turned 18!) And the “nobody knows” comment isn’t accurate. Dylan Farrow “knows” what he did to her and has been telling her story publicly for years. Years. People just dont want to “know” this about him so they pretend that she must have been coached by a disgruntled Mia AnD if Soon Yi is fine now as an adult, then it’s perfectly okay that he groomed her as a child and then married her as soon as she was an adult. it’s fine. Same with Polanski. The accuser says she’s gotten past it and is fine now. Doesn’t change the fact that he, as a grown adult in a position of power over her potential career, drugged and had sex with her when she was 14. People don’t like to admit when their idols are such flawed humans. Cognitive dissonance [/quote] +1 The PP to whom you're responding seems very eager to throw all blame onto Mia Farrow, including weirdly inserting a comment that "several" of her foster kids are dead. As if...what, exactly? She was somehow "behind" that too, so of course she's lied about Allen?? Just a strange and disturbing defense of Allen's scumminess. [/quote] I’m not eager but was reading a long article recently and came away conflicted about Allen, not Polanski. According to Soon Yi, this all went down when she was 21. Allen never lived with them, he lived across the street. He never adopted her, Andre Previn was her dad. She got together with Allen when she was 21. She is something like 47 now and still with him. I think she’s allowed to know herself and who she is and tell her side of the story. Are you sure you know much about the background of Allen? Consider the source of some of the accusations.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics