Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "the coloring of America"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Lots of interesting intersecting issues at play. Will take decades to sort out. As white men are marginalized more and more, there will be less of a common enemy for Democrats. That was at the heart of the affirmative action cases. The interplay between politics, marriage and child rearing will be interesting. Conservatives are having more children, or perhaps it is more accurate to say that having children is more aligned with conservative values presently. We have no idea how it plays out. It isn’t a given that as minority groups take power they will continue progressive liberal values (see Michigan townships where Muslim dominated city councils have scaled back on Pride celebrations). I don’t think a coloring of America leads in a straight line to progressive goals. It will be largely dependent on secularizing immigrant populations and I suspect changing birthing patterns will also be relevant. -A latino. [/quote] Wait so the plan really is for white men to become “marginalized more and more”? Isn’t that exactly what replacement theory is all about?[/quote] Glad I am not the only one seeing the "plan" to marginalize "white men". You know what this is called? Demographic Engineering. And I definitely have seen this trend over the decades...and it’s NOT a good trend. I met someone years ago and I mentioned that we had a diverse board of 7 directors because there was 1 woman and 1 POC...their response was "that's not diverse enough". So I think what I'm seeing is indeed demographic engineering...where groups in society are forced to have members with equal % representation from every single different type of demographic even though a a [b]certain group may be only 1% of the entire demographic population[/b]. That's not going to ever happen people nor should it ever happen. The problem is you cannot socially engineer the demographics of society like this. You see it happening with the entertainment industry with the forced inclusion of every single type of demographic. Some people will read this post and agree that demographic engineering is ok. I personally do not and will not ever support it.[/quote] You do realize that women are not 1% of the population right? White people are only about 70% of the population and declining. So your premise is very faulty. [/quote] I wasn't referring to women or any particular demographic when I referred to 1%, it was merely and example to make a point about demographic engineering. It's about demographic engineering to merely check the box on quotas.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics