Reply to Scott Peterson Netflix Documentary

Forum Index » Entertainment and Pop Culture

Reply to "Scott Peterson Netflix Documentary "

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]The guy is clearly guilty.  I’m shocked that anyone with a functioning brain could think otherwise.[/quote]

No forensic DNA tied him to the death. It’s all circumstantial evidence like what he told his girlfriend about the relationship being over (most cheaters say that ) and going fishing.

That doesn’t mean he killed his wife. [/quote]
They found her hair in a pair of pliers on his boat that he used to dump her body.

Is DNA evidence the only way to prove a murder? [/quote]

Hair is found anywhere. That’s not proof of murder. Laci had thick head of long curly hair. I’m sure her hair follicles shed everywhere.

Where is the blood evidence? Laci was practically decapitated.  Her body was dismembered. Where were the scratches and bruises on his arm from Laci fighting back during the strangulation? Where’s the evidence from Laci’s mop that he used in the house to clean up? What about the duct tape on her mouth? No evidence there either. No blood on the boat.

Do you really think he’d do all that especially on Christmas Eve when everyone was at home and had family over? He just dismembered a body or carried it out whole into his car on Christmas morning and went fishing to dump the body? Dog apparently doesn’t say a thing during all this dismemberment. He calls Lacis family to ask where she is in the afternoon. Why would he want to alarm them that she’s missing and not home? That gives him away if he’s the killer right?
[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics