Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Real Estate
Reply to "Brookland?"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]EOTP areas are always the first he feel downturns and then the hardest. Did people think that because a couple white people from state schools moved in that the dynamics of disproportionate crime and economic impacts would cease? That the schools would turn around? People with means didn’t want to live there for the last 100 years but you thought the last ten years was the new forever normal? This could be a blip a dip or a crash but what ever it is you signed up for a front row seat to it and all future neg fluctuations. Not the end of the world but don’t act surprised. [/quote] Brookland has ALWAYS been stable because of Catholic. Some neighborhoods don't want to mirror WOTP. The people there are fantastic. I also think in the last 10 years it's become too expensive.[/quote] Arguing two different perspectives. One is the ability to have a stable home life at a place which all areas will be different strokes for different folks. The other is market position of an area and there is a course a spectrum. Brookland is sliding towards the lower end of the spectrum but it isn’t Barry Farms or inner PG when it comes to market dynamics. The lower end tends to feel market effects worse relative to their place on the spectrum. That seems true enough [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics