Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Beauty and Fashion
Reply to "The Dress that swept Capitol Hill - Tuckernuck Jackie"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Honestly this is really mean but I refuse to buy the Jackie because I saw a linkedin post where an old woman was wearing it. She was like 5' and 200 pounds so it looked terrible on her. [/quote] For reasons I don't totally understand women who are short and curvy tend to be the most likely to wear this dress. It's very obvious from the photos on the website that it will look best on a woman with long limbs and even then probably needs to be tailored to fit just right. I wonder if the appeal is that because the dress is very boxy it's not going to pull and be tight over a large chest or wide hips. Which it's true -- it doesn't. But it will also add width to these areas. I think it can work on a short curvy woman if she's teeny tiny and she gets it tailored. Like I could see this on Reese Witherspoon when she's in her Draper James southern prep mode. With a pair of high heels in a neutral color and hair up to lengthen the neck. But it would only work because though she's short Reese is also little and she has great legs.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics