Reply to NATO Summit in DC this week

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "NATO Summit in DC this week "

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]
What exactly does Zelensky want to win his war and be done with the slaughter?

Or is the entire NATO goal to drag it out as long as they can to move towards the WEF depopulation agenda?

[/quote]

Big Z just asked for 128 F-16s, so at least that.

The NATO goal was originally stated as "diminishing Russian capabilities on the cheap." Its no longer cheap, and Russian capabilities are actually growing. So either they just can't admit they screwed up, or they do have something more sinister in mind. [/quote]

It actually has been relatively cheap.  Most of what we've given Ukraine is just old gear from the 1990s and earlier, F-16s included.  The "billions" are largely a bookkeeping exercise for the assets that we already paid for decades ago.[/quote]

This is a fact:

- M-113 armored personnel carriers?  We have donated hundreds of these Vietnam-era vehicles to Ukraine; we routinely DUMP M-113s into the ocean to form artificial corral reefs; other M-113s are used as artillery targets; they have been obsolete for decades. Google it.

- Hawk guided missiles?  They were used as Florida costal defense during: The Cuban Missile Crisis.  Long obsolete.  Ukraine is putting them to good use.  It’s cheaper to donate them than to scrap them.

Ukraine is effectively using our obsolete junk to defend itself from Russia (which is also fighting largely with leftover Cold War weapons).[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics