Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Jobs and Careers
Reply to "McKinsey putting 3000 staffers on pip "
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Why not just do a layoff?[/quote] Bad press and severance. [/quote] It's better to announce you have 3,000 poor performers attending client needs?[/quote] They aren’t being staffed on engagements right now [/quote] [b]How can they improve then? [/b]I know the point is for them to leave but it seems that leaving is the only option. [/quote] They can't, that's the conundrum. This is 100% work drying up and looking at the middle management (the people wondering about their college kids have unfounded fears, that pipeline is both strong and CHEAP) for layoffs. It's...probably shortsighted (usually is from a client delivery standpoint!) but the stakeholders must be appeased. How can someone in this improve? LEAVE! Go to your clients and get out of this shitshow. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
