Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "Bye-bye Chevron "
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Guys, it’s totally cool. All this will result in is that Congress will actually have to be subject matter experts and account for any variances or unknowns when they craft laws, since they can’t defer to subject matter experts at agencies any more. I’m sure they’ll ensure the appropriate levels of particulate matter are filtered out in our tap water or whatever. It’s not like lobbyists will be involved.[/quote] That sounds much better than being ruled by unelected “subject matter experts”. How long before you start pushing for philosopher kings? How long have you hated democracy? How long have you held such contempt for the people of the United States of America? [/quote] Uh, do you know the professions and expertise of our elected officials? Do you want Jim Jordan writing water policy? Or Matt Gaetz crafting regulation for particulates in fertilizer? Or Marge Greene opining on the gauge width electric charging tubes?[/quote] I would rather have idiots who are accountable to the voters writing laws than unelected subject matter experts who are also given deference by the court system. The latter simply turns into an unaccountable super state. [/quote] You know this will create more bureaucratic gridlock than it solves, right? I wonder, after the corporate SC shills strike this down, if blue states will just band together and say “we adopt whatever the EU standards are”. That would be awesome. Less fking blue 40 and red 42 dyes in our skittles. Either way, I can’t get behind your idiotic platitudes. It’s like you think you’re don Quixote fighting the imaginary windmill of qualified experts at agencies who somehow want to tell YOU how to live and that YOU don’t have the right to drink lead in your water. No one is going to tell YOU anything. lol. You know 25% of Americans have an iq of 85 or less? It explains a lot. Also, propaganda works.[/quote] You know that elimination of Chevron will simply restore the constitutional check of judicial review, right? Your contempt for the American voter and the constitutional process is oozing from your post. If political spectrum really is just a horseshoe you may want to take note of just how close you are to the Jan 6 insurrectionists in your contempt for the American voter. The repudiation of Chevron will simply return us to a world where unelected, unaccountable subject matter experts will no longer receive deference from the judicial check on their power. It really is telling that you are afraid of judicial review. It is almost like you can’t get your political agenda through the normal electoral process. Maybe just do the work of getting the votes you want? For the record, I am a conservationist. I don’t want lead in water, devastation of wildlife or a long list of other terrible events. But giving deference to unchecked government power is simply not the answer. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics