Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "Bye-bye Chevron "
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Regulations are liability protection by specifying the minimum requirements to comply with a law. Most regulatory agencies are friendly to the industry they regulate because interest groups and friendly Members of the House and Senate make it so. Whatever companies save by negating regulations, they will spend much more on attorneys and end up with uncertain and changing requirements dictated by various court cases. There won’t be no rules. There will be a jumble of case-by-case rules. [/quote] So much this. Plus, won't all those agency folks that write regulations just switch over to being expert witnesses to explain things in court to judges? Regulations are guidance about laws -- and without regulations, judges will still want guidance for statutory interpretation. The idea that getting rid of Chevron will be a means to dismantle agencies seems like a bizzaro fantasy. And instead of having one nationwide regulation subject to notice and comment from the public, there will be various court decisions that could be all over the place without any opportunity for public review and comment before those decisions are released and inforced. Great jobs program for attorneys and judges! [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics