Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "“Domestic supply of infants”"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]You people are insane. The planet has too many people now. I hope we contract by at least 2-3 billion. [/quote] You'll get what you want, but it's going to be incredibly painful for poor and vulnerable people. [/quote] Forced birther positions are also mostly at the expense of hurting poor and vulnerable people.[/quote] Your either obtuse or you can't understand the issue. Declining fertility is a fact, not a position. It is happening regardless of how you feel about it. ABC cited it as justification to undo RvW, which means that being anti-abortion is her position. You will get nowhere fighting reality (declining fertility) when your actual issue is with that particular policy prescription to address it. Let me help you: you can increase fertility rates without reducing abortion and the data suggests that they aren't that closely linked anyway. The people most likely to have abortions are from demographics most likely to have babies. The demographic least likely to have abortions is also least likely to have babies. So you can see that it makes more sense to use other methods to increase it. There's robust empirical evidence that US women want to have more kids than they are having. So you can stop acting like women are being victimized by plots to increase fertility, ie, to give them what they want. [/quote] We are on the same page. Forced birther policies will not fix the declining birth rate problem and may even have the opposite effect. We need to go back to roe and we will go back to roe sooner or later.[/quote] Okay then your issue is with RvW and possibly adoptive parents (which I don't understand but whatever). Not with people who rightly point out that declining fertility rates are a problem for our society. [/quote] What is your position on roe?[/quote] Hello? Do you have a position on overturning roe?[/quote] Relax lady. I had to step away. My position is that it was a weak ruling that should have been codified in legislation. [/quote] What does roe have to do with a declining birth rate if anything? [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics