Reply to You don't think it's news that the reporter who debunked pizzagate

Forum Index » Website Feedback

Reply to "You don't think it's news that the reporter who debunked pizzagate"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=jsteele][quote=Anonymous][quote=jsteele][quote=Anonymous][quote=jsteele][quote=Anonymous][quote=jsteele][quote=Anonymous]It's newsworthy that someone was convicted of child sexual abuse, completely independently of any pizzagate connections.

What was the article about the conviction? [/quote]

According to the post following yours, the article was completely fake.
[/quote]

If my name is on an article that states that, say, there was massive voter fraud in PA and that statement has been found to be false, would it be fair to call me an election denier?[/quote]

You can't be this stupid (I mean, you can, but I am assuming that you aren't). If you wrote an article saying that there was massive voter fraud in PA and that statement is later found to be false, it would be fair to call you an election denier. If, on the other hand, massive election fraud was discovered, your article would be accurate, even if you yourself were later convicted of voter fraud.

In this case, Gordon Meek never debunked PizzaGate. In an article about Russian propaganda, he mentioned, "the debunked 'Pizzagate' conspiracy theory". That is a completely accurate description. [/quote]

Gordon Meek put his name on the article. So it’s accurate to say he was part and parcel in debunking Pizzagate. I’m not saying that Pizzagate is true. I’m simply stating that Meek was supporting the abuse of children while at the same time, calling out Cernovich for believing a story about child abuse. Pretty ironic.[/quote]

Okay, I gave you the benefit of the doubt but you really are that stupid. Meek did not debunk PizzaGate. He mentioned that others had debunked the conspiracy theory. That was an accurate statement and one with which you apparently agree. Similarly, he described the many conspiracies that Cernovich propagated. He was also accurate about that. I am not sure why you are criticizing Meek for his accurate writing while defending his inaccurate allegations about Arabs. [/quote]

I don’t’ know why you are defending a man who abused kids? [/quote]

I am not defending him. Why are you defending conspiracy theorist Cernovich and supporting Meek's inaccurate reporting on Arabs?
[/quote]I’m not defending Cernovich on the location. Regarding the potential bombing, even the FBI said there was chatter and it wasn’t from US sources. So Meek was not entirely wrong on this. Given how much we know about the FBI now, I think it’s safe to say they don’t always tell the whole truth:

[i]“ On July 6, 2006, the New York Daily News released a story claiming the FBI had disrupted a terrorist plot to bomb the tunnels connecting New Jersey with Manhattan and drown the New York Financial District with a torrent of water.

The following day the FBI clarified there had been online messages about the idea, but none of the authors were in the United States or making efforts to enter the United States, and counterterrorism officials cast doubt on the significance of the alleged plot and some authorities questioned the breaking news first reported by James Gordon Meek.”. [/i]

[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics