Reply to Debating Planned C-Section v. Vaginal Birth (1st child)

Forum Index » Expectant and Postpartum Moms

Reply to "Debating Planned C-Section v. Vaginal Birth (1st child)"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I had a pretty bad tear. Healed perfectly and was able to duck 6 weeks after birth. No issues. Went onto have 2 more kids and those births were easier, less tears.

I've actually heard quite a few bad c section stories from friends. There's no perfect choice.

Perfect vaginal birth > planned c section > difficult vaginal birth > emergency c section > emergency c section after laboring for hours[/quote]

I don’t agree with this. A bad vaginal can tear you from vagina to anus, cause severe pelvic organ prolapse, give you a fistula, break your tailbone, or cause tearing of your cervix, vaginal side walls, labia, urethra, and more. It can render you incontinent of urine and feces. It can cause nerve damage so your ability to experience orgasm is impacted or impaired, and make
You unable to control stool or gas. It can cause your pelvic floor muscles to permanently rip from your pelvis. These things don’t commonly happen with a C section. Plenty of other bad things can happen with a C section but often it’s the emergency ones that actually are somewhat protective of the horrible vaginal injuries (often caused by an excessive effort to birth vaginally). These births are often a medical emergency and involve forceps and vacuum. Forceps are the devil OP, and refuse them if you have a choice to do so. Ask me how I know so well about all this.  [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics