Reply to Parents of three, do you feel less bonded to your third?

Forum Index » General Parenting Discussion

Reply to "Parents of three, do you feel less bonded to your third?"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]It's the middle child you lose the bond with, if you had it to begin with. The baby is often the favorite, or the one you are most connected to. The middle loses their role.[/quote]

Maybe for you, but this is a generalization that does not account for ages, temperaments, etc. This question also wrongly presumes that a parent cannot be strongly bonded to three children. OP is a troll. 
[/quote]

It's rare for parents to be equally bonded to all children, especially once you are in the 3+ category. It's ideal, but not that common. Some kids handle it better than others.[/quote]

DP. Is that based on your personal experience?  Or studies or something?  I’m thinking about families I know with 3+ kids (my siblings, my friends growing up, extended family, etc) and I think most parents did have strong bonds with all their kids. Of course I grew up UMC with emotionally healthy people. Ymmv. [/quote]

Based on years of private practice as a therapist, largely to UMC families, middle child syndrome is absolutely a real phenomenon. There is a great deal of literature on this. Birth order isn't everything, but there are common dynamics in families with 3+ children,  and the overlooked or invisible middle child is quite common. Often layered with other dynamics.

I don't think this dynamic is automatic, and conscientious parents can take steps to counteract it. But people thinking if having more than 2 children, at any socioeconomic level, should be aware of these issues. [/quote]

100% correct!

My parents are wealthy and I've always felt invisible as a middle [/quote]

Op here. This is so interesting to me. If anything I favor my middle and worry about the baby being ignored. I wonder if it just comes down to individual family dynamics. [/quote]

The middle child dynamic comes into play more clearly as your children get older and their emotional needs become more complex. Right now your toddler gets attention because you’re still putting out fires and navigating tantrums.

The middle child invisibility starts after they stop screaming as their primary means of communication. At that point it’s common for the parent to still focus on the screaming baby. The first born has novelty of doing everything first to hold the parents’ interest. Meanwhile, the parents are tapped out on attention for the middle child. It’s hard to get excited for kindergarten graduation when you’ve already done it for your oldest and you’re just tired and want to nap. Of course, by the time your youngest has kindergarten graduation, you’re already feeling how quickly time flies and that this is your last chance to experience these milestones. This happens over and over again for sports, school, and anything else requiring parental engagement.[/quote]

This is true for both me and DH, who were both the second child of our parents but followed by the third who was the baby and the only girl/boy. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics