Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Off-Topic
Reply to "What do you think of the $55 million settlement in the Johns Hopkins malpractice case?"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous]Unfortunately, it has been observed that juries often think that someone with deep pockets should pay when a baby is injured, whether or not the party in question actually did anything wrong. When the jurors are asked, after the trial, they will often admit it. As others have observed, people also do not want to believe that bad things happen to people without someone being at fault. Add these two together, and this is why the cost of insurance for OB's is though the roof. I don't know what the judge was thinking when he disallowed the evidence re: the midwife. I'm not a malpractice attorney, but that point does seem ripe for appeal. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
