Reply to Finreg or best paying federal agencies?

Forum Index » Jobs and Careers

Reply to "Finreg or best paying federal agencies?"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]OP-  I was an administrative manager in a GS job that moved to the SEC.  I took a grade cut but got a substantial raise.  I now make $ 50K more than my spouse who is a GS15/step10.  That is before the other SEC only benefits.  200 people applied for my position and they interviewed over 10 people.  These are very desirable positions.  I am very grateful [/quote]

And this is the problem with most finregs. Finregs get outsize pay for the complexity of the work done by those on the line (ie attorneys, economists, etc). Yet everyone gets the outsize pay, including those that have completely fungible jobs across the government, like admins. They should be on a separate, lower pay scale. It may be an unpopular opinion, but it's the truth. [/quote]

I recently moved from a GS position to a finreg, and I have noticed a jump in the capability of admin-type people (HR, IT, office managers). Paying more draws better candidates.[/quote]

Doesn't change the fact that the function in and of itself is over compensated at the finregs.

Finregs pay more because the line staff must compete against the population they regulate. And frequently have job offers from the same. Those positions in private attract top talent, and pay multiples of what a finreg offers.  [b]Admin positions at finregs are overcompensated relative to their peers in private.[/b] Sorry, but that's incontrovertible. [/quote]

You are wrong.  Just one example:

HR lead at JPMC base pay up to 190,000:   https://jpmc.fa.oraclecloud.com/hcmUI/CandidateExperience/en/sites/CX_1001/job/210378588/?keyword=Digital
[/quote]

I'm very much correct. I won't post it here to preserve anonymity, but it's easy to search a public database and find, for example, SEC hr staff making in the 220s. And that's all base, not inclusive of benefits. That's preposterous. [/quote]

the problem here is you. what's preposterous is that you work at a well-compensated agency, and you are spending your energy disrespecting and denigrating basically any work that is not yours. you are spending energy *resenting* what other employees make when what they make has no effect on your salary or taxes whatsoever.

please find a way to use your new $1000 health benefit to get outside and touch grass, and then maybe try some meditation to work on your anger issues. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics