Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
LGBTQIA+ Issues and Relationship Discussion
Reply to "US supreme court strikes blow against LGBTQ+ rights with Colorado ruling"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Cool. Can’t wait to refuse service to evangelical Christians. [/quote] Yes, this!![/quote] Religion is a protected category. Politics is not. Put it this way, would you force a Muslim to design a website that was openly hostile to Islam? In a hugely diverse country and one that is only getting more diverse, the only way to accommodate all the various viewpoints is not to impose a binary across all of them. [/quote] Hate is against my religion so hating gay people is against my religion so yes we can deny them services now.[/quote] You didn't answer the question. Would you force a conservative Muslim to design a website that was openly hostile to Islam? Yes or no? Likewise, would you force a LGBTA+whatever designer create a website that was openly hostile to LGBTA+ whatever people? t's clear the activists are upset because one of their pet progressive protected groups, this time the LGBTA+whatever, is involved, so all logic has gone out the window, but the same scenario applies across all beliefs and viewpoints. That's why the SCOTUS and previous courts ruled in favor of the designer. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics