Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
LGBTQIA+ Issues and Relationship Discussion
Reply to "US supreme court strikes blow against LGBTQ+ rights with Colorado ruling"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Cool. Can’t wait to refuse service to evangelical Christians. [/quote] Yes, this!![/quote] Religion is a protected category. Politics is not. Put it this way, would you force a Muslim to design a website that was openly hostile to Islam? In a hugely diverse country and one that is only getting more diverse, the only way to accommodate all the various viewpoints is not to impose a binary across all of them. [/quote] Hate is against my religion so hating gay people is against my religion so yes we can deny them services now.[/quote] You can deny them specific services that compel speech from you that goes against your beliefs.[/quote] The religious beliefs of the complainant were never established. Does she follow all the tenets of her religion or does she pick and choose? Is she in good standing? Does her priest or pastor say she has to refuse gays and all other “sinners” or just gays? [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics