Reply to Why does DCPS rank 49th in the country, behind poor states like Kentucky, Tennessee and WV?

Forum Index » DC Public and Public Charter Schools

Reply to "Why does DCPS rank 49th in the country, behind poor states like Kentucky, Tennessee and WV?"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]It was fairly shocked to see just how much time and resources at our majority minority school are devoted to “anti racism”  curriculum.  I mean, 90% of the kids are well below grade level.   Shouldn’t every minute of every day be spent on math/reading?  It’s bizarre. [/quote]

My kids attend a DCPS Title 1 school and spend zero hours/time on anti-racism curriculum. You’re a troll.[/quote]

NP. You are naive and obviously don’t know what your kid is learning.  Anti-racism is definitely embedded in the curriculum, no doubt.  Also as you get to higher grades in middle and high school, it tends to dominate.[/quote]

You might be surprised to learn that anti-racism efforts are more robust in Ward 3 schools than anywhere else in the city. Yes, anti-racism is embedded in the curriculum, however it's not explicitly taught as a learning standard. While you might have learned 30 years ago the white supremacy perspective on slavery, current curriculum takes a more holistic approach without leaving out the voices and experiences of those who were enslaved. See how fast we can get to an anti-racism lesson without saying "Today's learning objective will be that all students will be able to define anti-racism." In many schools in Ward 3 Black History month is celebrated with much more effort than many other schools. Why do you suppose that might be?[/quote]

Please tell me the "White Supremacist version of history" that was taught in DC.

[/quote]

Not "White Supremacist version of history" rather perspective on slavery, as an example. Any historical textbook that didn't include the perspective and/or experiences of an enslaved person, or Native American is by definition bias. Any lesson, for that matter. Consider Christopher Columbus in a more comprehensive historical context and the comparison of curriculum 50 years to those used in classroom nows. Find me a textbook from 1970 that is inclusive to all voices on the subject of Christopher Columbus and him finding America.[/quote]

You'd have to go pretty far back to find a textbook that didn't include the perspective of slaves and indigenous people.  It may not have been gotten its full share of coverage, but it was there.

I went to public elementary school in the Deep South in the 1970s, and I certainly learned that slavery was miserable for the slaves and that indigenous people were treated badly.[/quote]

Maybe. I went to public elementary school in the midwest in the 1970s and distinctly remember being confused by the concept of ownership of another human being and the illustrations in textbooks of enslaved people with happy smiles while in the cotton fields. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics