Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Entertainment and Pop Culture
Reply to "Are rich & famous people using surrogates…"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]…because (1) they can’t get pregnant or (2) for the convenience factor (ie, do not want to slow down career or “ruin” their body)? Personally, I find it very disturbing if an otherwise healthy & fertile woman who can physically have a baby without issue pays someone else to carry her fertilized egg. Renting other people’s bodies in the absence of a compelling health issue or physical inability to carry to term seems….highly problematic. Almost akin to buying someone’s organ for a transplant. It feels like we are seeing a wave of surrogacy right now in Hollywood that is disproportionate to their actual numbers. Like, people are doing it because they can and there’s no real pushback. The only people I know IRL using surrogates are gay male couples. And that’s a compelling reason, imho, because they can’t otherwise have a child. So is the wave of surrogacy among the rich and famous due to need or convenience? [/quote] Gay men can adopt. I know two gay couples who fostered to adopt. [/quote] Adoption is wonderful, and people who care for orphaned children are heroes. Still, that's different from having a baby with genetic inheritance, which is a natural human need. Gay men couples are no more obligated to adopt than straight couples are. [/quote] Other than celebrities, straight couples often go for adoption because they can't have their own. Its not a choice. Gay couples make a choice that they can't have children in a way nature intended. Adoption is probably more acceptable for them.[/quote] It’s MUCH harder for gay couples to adopt. A recent Supreme Court decision for example, upheld a state-funded adoption agency in Pennsylvania’s rights to refuse to consider gay couples (due to freedom of religion.) It is my understanding that most gay couples do adopt and they do it internationally. Most gestational carriers help married straight couples, who cannot conceive. However, for some reason this seems to bother you as well. Regarding straight married couples, the idea that all straight couples who cannot conceive should simply adopt is absurd. The waiting list are extreme. You have no idea what they may be going through. Perhaps most importantly, who made you some sort of Judge? My guess is that you’re not a very kind person from what you’re saying. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics