Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Metropolitan DC Local Politics
Reply to "600 child abuse victims of the Catholic Church in MD"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]….and not one of the perpetrators was transgender. https://www.nytimes.com/2023/04/05/us/catholic-church-abuse-baltimore.html?smid=nytcore-ios-share&referringSource=articleShare #GROOMERS[/quote] No, but they were predominantly homosexual pedophiles. [/quote] No they were not. It’s a crime of opportunity male abusers are more likely to work at all boys schools. When moved to girls schools they continued to abuse.[/quote] Over 95% of the victims (children) of these priests were male. 100% of the priests are/were men. How can you not say homosexual pedophile priests are/were the problem. Good lord. And I will throw in any straight priests who covered for them. Wish they could’ve locked all these sickos up but please do not cover for priests just because they are gay. Not all gay priests were pedophiles but these ones certainly were. [/quote] Because there were no girl alter boys, because men taught at boy schools. Geez you guys need to educate yourselves. So much ignorance. Guess what most rape in jail is male on male… do you know why?[/quote] Delusional. Priests had opportunities to access both boys and girls. Guess what? In almost every instance they chose males. Not because that was all that was there, it was all they desired. There is always this knee-jerk reaction when someone brings up the painfully obvious point that gay men flooded the priesthood particularly from the ‘50s to the ‘80s and some of them had proclivities towards young males. Shocker. [/quote] You are a complete ignoramus on the subject. You are just a bigot looking for a reason to hate gay people. Educate yourself.[/quote] And there it is. Can’t argue facts so just call someone a homophobe. I could say the same about you and the Church. At least I can admit the flaws of the church. To you, gays do no wrong and could not possibly be to blame for any of this scandal. Yeah, right. [/quote] I’ve already given you facts. Men are abusers, both gay and straight. They rape at the same rate, but they rape adults. Pedophiles are neither heterosexual nor homosexual. They are pedophiles.. pedophile do not have a preference for gender they have a preference for age.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics