Reply to Biden nominees

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "Biden nominees"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]How is that a trick question??[/quote]

It’s a trick question because literally no one would know the answer. [/quote]

But a lot of people of this thread, including non lawyers, are telling you they know the answer.[/quote]

I’m a lawyer who knows the answers. Both of them. So, I would also ask for clarification about whether he was talking about a motion under the Brady Bill (which is a 2A issue) or concerning the Brady case.  The ignorant people are the ones who don’t consider that h there is also a 2A Brady Bill (named after the Agent shot protecting Reagan). [/quote]

Wait, you think a judge would see a motion based on a law that sunsetted in 2004? [/quote]

Brady did not sunset in 2004.  Where did you get that idea?  Pretty embarrassing mistake from a legal eagle like you.[/quote]

The Brady bill PP was talking about did. Reading comprehension not your strong suit? [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics