Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "Biden nominees"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]How is that a trick question??[/quote] It’s a trick question because literally no one would know the answer. [/quote] But a lot of people of this thread, including non lawyers, are telling you they know the answer.[/quote] I’m a lawyer who knows the answers. Both of them. So, I would also ask for clarification about whether he was talking about a motion under the Brady Bill (which is a 2A issue) or concerning the Brady case. The ignorant people are the ones who don’t consider that h there is also a 2A Brady Bill (named after the Agent shot protecting Reagan). [/quote] And if he ever got a Brady motion as a judge, it would come along with a written brief. He'd have law clerks that would then analyze the briefs and write a memo for him. He'd have the chance to read the case law on it. He would not just give a pop fly ruling. Just like it is completely irrelevant that Coney-Barrett couldn't answer a pop fly question about the bill of rights; SCOTUS justices don't actually have to memorize it and spit it out on demand from the bench. This is a stupid controversy.[/quote] So, you think it is normal for a sitting judge not to know what a Brady motion is? Kennedy even asked him if he was familiar with Brady v. Maryland. He said he thought it had to do with the 2nd amendment. I'm sorry. This is basic stuff. Very basic. It is one thing for him to never had a Brady motion in his "4 1/2 years as a judge." It is quite another for him not to even know what it is... even when Kennedy cited the case. [/quote] So, you think it's normal for a sitting judge to not know the five freedoms in the bill of rights It's basic stuff. Very basic.[/quote] Oh, please. She knew them. She asked which one she left off after she rattled off 4. Thankfully, she had a clue. Unlike this unqualified nominee. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics