Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "Biden nominees"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]How is that a trick question??[/quote] It’s a trick question because literally no one would know the answer. [/quote] But a lot of people of this thread, including non lawyers, are telling you they know the answer.[/quote] I’m a lawyer who knows the answers. Both of them. So, I would also ask for clarification about whether he was talking about a motion under the Brady Bill (which is a 2A issue) or concerning the Brady case. The ignorant people are the ones who don’t consider that h there is also a 2A Brady Bill (named after the Agent shot protecting Reagan). [/quote] And if he ever got a Brady motion as a judge, it would come along with a written brief. He'd have law clerks that would then analyze the briefs and write a memo for him. He'd have the chance to read the case law on it. He would not just give a pop fly ruling. Just like it is completely irrelevant that Coney-Barrett couldn't answer a pop fly question about the bill of rights; SCOTUS justices don't actually have to memorize it and spit it out on demand from the bench. This is a stupid controversy.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics