Reply to Importance of classmates being at grade levels for reading/math

Forum Index » DC Public and Public Charter Schools

Reply to "Importance of classmates being at grade levels for reading/math"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote]
This can’t be true though. You can have kids that are “well above grade level” at a school like L-T and then say that they don’t stand out at all and that they have many peers doing as well. Statistically, this doesn’t work. About half of L-T students test below grade level. About half are at or above grade level. If the PP’s kids are WELL above grade level, they are doing better than the vast majority of their classmates. Based on PARCC scores. 
[/quote]

Let's see through your "statistics". I claimed that my kids test about in the top 5-10% in tests in which nation-wide data are indicated. There are about 60 kids per grade. I am claiming that about 10% of them (6) test about in the top 10% nation-wide. (I'm also happy to include among their peers students who test in the top 20%.) I'll leave it as an exercise to you to figure out how this is compatible with a majority of students testing below grade level. Second exercise, look at the PARCC scores for L-T and acknowledge how this actually fits the school's data.

[quote]
So either the PP is overestimating her kid’s abilities (which is ok, lots of people view their children through rose-colored glasses) or she is overestimating the percentage of the rest of the class who is at the same level. Either way, it’s not that useful if a data point.[/quote]

So having refuted your first claim, let's talk about the idea that I would come here on an anonymous forum boasting about my kids performance. What's not useful is your pathetic contributions. [/quote]

Wow people in the other thread talking about the vibe at L-T should come check out this condescending and weirdly angry poster (whose kids are both top 10% in the nation, obviously, despite only one of them having taken the PARCC). This might be the reason some people find the parent community clique-y and not very welcoming. Apparently if your kid is not also top 10% (again, based on nothing for the younger child except the PP’s assertions) you can’t be part of their kids friend group.[/quote]

^ oh sorry, I see she will also include kids in the top 20%. Phew. Again, what this is based on for her kid below 3rd, unclear. The tests at Mathnasium and Kumon?

Anyway you seem like a delight, no doubt anyone would enjoy going to school with your children where I’m sure you are definitely not weirdly intense and competitive![/quote]

Probably MAP or iReady testing administered by the school.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics