Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Schools and Education General Discussion
Reply to "To Increase Equity, School Districts Eliminate Honors Classes"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Parents should be pushing the school board and administrators on this. Loudoun implemented VMPI early, eliminated 6th grade algebra, and had staff that wanted to eliminate 6th grade prealgebra. Nevertheless, with parental pressure, 6th grade algebra was reinstated for 2022-2023. Fairfax has I think Tina Mazzacane handling math curriculum, and she is on record wanting to eliminate different math tracks. She instead wants to settle on algebra in 8th grade is advanced, so they are actually making math class tougher by putting everyone in this class.[/quote] Yep I think E3 will look to remove a path to 7th grade algebra while all the other efforts push to bring everyone to 8th grade Algebra. I just dont see how the equity police will stop there. AAP will be next. [/quote] More BS and speculation from the "anti-equity" people. [/quote] Do you think it is equitable to have three different Algebra entry points (7,8,9) that results in varying Math outcomes for HS students?[/quote] The Algebra entry point aren't the cause of different math outcomes, they're a symptom. Assuming your answer to your question is no, wouldn't you also answer "no" to these questions: Do you think it's equitable to have multiple different senior year math classes (basic/remedial math, normal precalc, honors precalc, Calc AB, Calc BC) that result in varying math outcomes for undergrad students? Do you think it's equitable to have different degrees that result in varying career outcomes for college graduates? Do you think it's equitable to have different careers that result in varying income options for employees? If you want to see what your version of "equity" looks like in practice, I suggest you go read [i]Harrison Bergeron[/i] by Kurt Vonnegut[/quote] Of course those varying results in senior year, career, and income arent equitable. [/quote] Good. The kids aren't equal in smarts or effort or skills either. No one is. I hope we never have "equity" - it would be evil.[/quote] How exactly are you defining "equity" here? [/quote] Im just trying to understand if having multiple tracks of math would be equitable for people who are proponents of equity. I support differentiation and tracking. Not sure if that fits into the pro-equity viewpoint or not. [/quote] I'm not an equity "proponent" - I only speak for myself. I support clustering with extensions (available to all) through elementary school maybe up to middle school/6th or 7th. Alternate math paths opening up in 7th or 8th. No tracking. [/quote] What does Clustering mean here? Grouping students based on ability to understand and solve math problem? How it is different from Tracking?[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics