Reply to Breaking up because there is a lack of physical attraction/chemistry

Forum Index » Relationship Discussion (non-explicit)

Reply to "Breaking up because there is a lack of physical attraction/chemistry"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]OP you just sound like a classical poly man type. Nobody would be ever good enough for you because you really can't have a monogamous long relationship. You need constant stimulation with new partner. There are many guys like that in  their mid 50s still single on OLD.

LTR and marriage is not for everyone. [/quote]

I don't think so. I like the idea of being with one person. And I realize that newness is always different. I'm not asking for butterflies all over again. But it comes down to effort. I try to live each day/week/year being the best version of myself I can be. I may not have the genetics to have an 8-pack and 20 inch arms, but I'm going to maximize what I can achieve with raw effort. I'm going to wear the nicest and most flattering clothes I can afford, and continue to groom in ways that maximize my attractiveness the same way I did on my first date night. What I don't understand is why I seem to end up with women who do backflips in the bedroom for the first year and are always wearing heels, bronzer, and "sexy" outfits on date nights but then trade that in for cardigans and duty sex a year later. I can't seem to find someone who wants to inspire me and vice versa so that monogamy is as fresh as it can be. I'm not asking for new, I'm asking for your best effort day in and day out.[/quote]

Have you ever considered being with the reverse? A woman who doesn't do all of that at first? Or can you not get it up for that? [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics