Reply to Have you ever taken a polygraph? Lots of questions for you.

Forum Index » Off-Topic

Reply to "Have you ever taken a polygraph? Lots of questions for you. "

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]If you sit for it, you could still decline to answer questions. If they ask if you’ve had affairs, you could say “I don’t think that’s relevant and I decline to answer.” Or you could say “I’m not currently having an affair.” I assume this would be about your vulnerability to extortion? [b]Tbh I think they should be more worried that you’re willing to sit for a polygraph to get a job. That seems like way too much faith in authority. [/b][/quote]

+100, I get if it was for an intelligence agency or top-secret military work, but a regular ol' private sector job?  No way[/quote]

It’s not really a regular 9-5 type job. It’s sort of an executive assistantship, except it sounds like a “My Man Friday” type job, where there’s all sorts of additional duties/responsibilities. Lots of travel coordination involved,  access to financial material/resources, and almost certainly proprietary business  information, and probably a pretty all encompassing NDA. So I “get” why they want someone who’s absolutely trustworthy. My H joked that it sounds like a Valet worthy of a Bond villain. I guess that’s sort of accurate in some regards. [/quote]

Ok, with this detail I am concerned for you OP. A 1:1 employer relationship requires a lot of humanity on both sides, and demanding a polygraph does not suggest the boss has this. At the very least, it shows s/he has terrible boundaries and does not respect employees as humans and professionals.

The upsides of the job sound good, but give equal thought to the worst case scenario. Could this person hurt your future prospects in this industry? Could you afford to quit if they are unbearable, and will this experience make you eligible for other jobs or is it a dead end that could trap you?[/quote]

So they're gonna find someone "trustworthy" by using an untrustworthy device with a 50% accuracy rate at best?  LOL this is like the stupidest Bond villain with a superiority complex and an ego the size of the sun who, like PP said, would throw you under the bus and probably pin some seedy stuff on his secretary without a second thought.  Requiring a polygraph to access finance materials and proprietary business info is also ridiculous; all of Wall St would need their own version of security clearance in that case, as would anyone working in a corporate job.  Come on now.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics