Reply to Hannah Natanson at it again

Forum Index » Fairfax County Public Schools (FCPS)

Reply to "Hannah Natanson at it again"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]The character was reflecting on his own personal memories from his own childhood. It was significant to him because it was his sexual awakening. Kids have sexual thoughts, actions, memories.

There is nothing wrong with that.

It’s not pornography. 
It’s not child pornography. 
It’s not pedophilia.

No matter how much you want it to be. It’s creepy that people view it like that. Maybe they’re projecting. 
 [/quote]

We send our kids to school to learn reading, writing, and math. Not to explore their sexuality or be sexually awakened. Our school board has the wrong priorities and scores are plummeting. [/quote]

Schools don’t have kids awaken/explore their sexuality at school. Kids handle that all on their own. Schools do provide sex education though, as they should.

And schools try to provide reading material that appeals to different people. For some older HS kids, these are great books that provide a different voice or experience.

So if you want kids to read, stop banning books. 
[/quote]

The purpose of sexuality education was for a public interest, to halt the spread of STDs and limit teenage pregnancy. Sex Ed is about teaching children the changes they experience during puberty and how to care for themselves. This material is the perversion of sexuality education. [/quote]

These books aren’t part of sex ed. They aren’t part of the curriculum at all.

They are just a different voice/story for older teens who may find it insightful. No one is forcing anyone to read these books. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics