Reply to Jack Smith — Special Counsel for Jan 6 and Mar-a-Lago inquiries

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "Jack Smith — Special Counsel for Jan 6 and Mar-a-Lago inquiries"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I guess this means Garland doesn't have the guts to indict. They caught him with classified documents, if they wanted to do it, it would already be done. [/quote]
He’s depoliticizing it. I think this raises the likelihood that there will be indictments.[/quote]

But the Special Counsel is inextricably linked to DOJ anyway. It puts an extra warm body between a political appointee and the investigation... and that's the best they can do, but it sure won't be enough for the Republicans.[/quote]

If it’s a Republican ordering it for a Democrat then it’s fine and completely objective and represents truth. If it’s ordered to investigate a Republican, it’s politically motivated investigation into a “nothingburger”.[/quote]

Which reminds me that Durham spent millions in taxpayer dollars over three years and came up with nothing.  Other than "On the FISA warrant Clinesmith left out that Carter Page once was an CIA informant" like as if that was sole basis of the FBI investigation, like as if that was the crime of the century.  Durham's JOB was to "debunk the 'debunked' Steele Dossier" and he totally fell on his face with that, because every lead he followed fell apart, and the only big linchpin he had left, Danchenko, was also a bust for him.  So in the end, he didn't disprove jack shyt about the dossier, didn't prove jack shyt about the FBI or anything else.  His entire investigation was a massive nothingburger.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics